Product walkthrough · Illustrative demo
From draft
to decision.
A review should end with a clear next step. Try a proofing flow that keeps the feedback, the revision, and the decision together.
An afternoon
at the studio.
Saturday, October 17 · 2–5 pm
The time is easy to find. The address is missing.
Please add the street address below the time.
Version 2 adds the address. Other feedback may still need a change.
The three steps
1. Review version 1: the invitation is missing its address.
2. Leave feedback: the comment stays attached to version 1.
3. Compare version 2: the address is added. Review the new proof before marking it ready.
What changed in this fictional release
Feedback has a place to land.
Feedback arrived in messages with no reliable link to the draft. “Looks good” could refer to an older file.
Comments name the version reviewed. A new revision opens alongside the feedback, and the final decision applies to that revision.
Where would this break down?
Who makes the final call?
Should one named reviewer mark a proof ready, or must every invited reviewer agree?
What reopens a decision?
Should any revision require another review, or only changes the author flags as significant?